Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 226

The statement expresses a strong opinion on a public issue, specifically criticizing the Supreme Court's decision and its impact on the Department of Education. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the decision harms children across the country.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by attributing negative intentions to the Supreme Court and Trump, potentially inciting anger or fear. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved by using inflammatory language. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given its accusatory tone. [-1]