In reply to:
CLaur
@CandicefromMe
·
7d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
7d
The statement is part of a public discourse on the issue of illegal arrests by immigration agents, as highlighted by a federal judge's ruling. The conversation involves criticism of political actions and the perceived inaction of certain groups over the past four years.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration over past inaction.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, focusing instead on blame and frustration. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not attack individuals personally, maintaining a focus on actions and outcomes. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived political failures, aiming for societal betterment through awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a political discussion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.