Ilhan Omar

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 79
7/17/2025, 8:24:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Rep. Ilhan Omar
@Ilhan
·
131d
The passage of these three disastrous bills allows Donald Trump and his wealthy backers to write the rules they want for their own gain.
Rep. Ilhan Omar
@Ilhan
·
131d
I voted NO on the three crypto bills.

These bills are not about helping consumers or promoting innovation. They are about protecting the profits of crypto insiders and billionaires while gutting the guardrails that protect the livelihoods of working people. (Thread 🧵)

The statement is accusatory and critical of Donald Trump, alleging his involvement in unethical financial activities related to cryptocurrency. It is part of a broader discussion on legislative actions concerning cryptocurrency regulation, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, as it accuses Trump of unethical behavior without providing evidence, potentially damaging his reputation. This violates the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement could be seen as disrespectful to Trump's dignity, as it accuses him of engaging in 'shady' activities without substantiation, which could be considered a form of harassment or defamation. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks a constructive or empathetic tone. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a personal attack on Trump rather than focusing on the policies or actions in question. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived corruption, which could be seen as an effort to better society by calling out unethical behavior, but it lacks evidence and constructive suggestions.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity, as it makes serious allegations without evidence. [-1]