Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement suggests that the Epstein files are being used to divert attention from other issues. This could be seen as engaging in public discourse as it touches on media and political priorities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the importance of the Epstein files. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the significance of the files. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it labels the files as a distraction without further explanation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.