Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Natalie Winters
@nataliegwinters
·
11d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the DOJ's actions regarding the Epstein case, a matter of public interest. It praises the DOJ's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts but criticizes the lack of transparency regarding Epstein's alleged intelligence ties. The tone is critical yet supportive of transparency.
- The statement aims to promote transparency, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for public access to information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by suggesting the release of information that is already under legal scrutiny, without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by calling for the release of information that could clarify public concerns. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by acknowledging the DOJ's positive action while pointing out areas for improvement. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.