Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the potential threats posed by AI and technology, particularly in the context of military applications and geopolitical tensions. The tone is somewhat dismissive of AI's role, suggesting it isn't as crucial as others might think.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could undermine serious discussions about AI threats.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses concerns about AI's role in potential threats. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses the importance of AI without providing substantial reasoning or engaging with the concerns raised. [-1]
4. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses free speech but does not use the platform to responsibly engage with the serious nature of the discussion. [-1]