In reply to:
food safety isn't a big deal
@sacrelicio
·
189d
The statement is part of a conversation about a political event involving a quorum check and a coordinated walkout, which suggests engagement with public issues related to political processes and governance. The tone is factual and explanatory, providing context to the situation.
- The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement provides factual information that could promote understanding of the situation, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to provide factual information about a public issue, upholding the principles of free speech and responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.