Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement is part of a public discourse on AI safety, engaging with public figures and addressing concerns about AI development and its potential risks. The tone is serious and seeks to clarify a position on AI safety, inviting a constructive dialogue rather than name-calling.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by addressing AI safety concerns, which is a responsible approach to a significant public issue. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by inviting a serious conversation and clarifying a position on AI safety. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by inviting a serious conversation and avoiding personal attacks, despite the mention of name-calling by others. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss AI safety, a critical public issue. [+1]