Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 94
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
72d
Gary, how can you think that AI is both stupid and dangerous? Isn’t there a contradiction there?

No:
7/20/2025, 3:44:50 AM
X
In reply to:
David Hinkle
@Drachs1978
·
72d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk I'm confused, Aren't you always saying AI is no big deal? Why do you feel that there's no super intelligence risk but also we need to take "ai safety" seriously?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
72d
Ok then, @elonmusk, stop accelerating recklessly, and endorse measures for AI safety more vigorously.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
72d
At times, AI existential dread is overwhelming

The statement is part of a broader public discourse on AI safety and the potential risks associated with artificial intelligence. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of AI development, its potential dangers, and the need for safety measures. The tone is serious and analytical, focusing on the debate over AI's capabilities and risks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a discussion on preventing potential harm from AI, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to understanding and empathy by engaging in a dialogue about AI safety, which is a concern for many. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, addressing disagreements without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to responsibly discuss AI safety issues. [+1]