Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
71d
The statement expresses frustration with the alignment community's approach to AI alignment, particularly in relation to 'black box' AI systems. It calls for alternative solutions and more vocal advocacy from the community, engaging with a broader conversation about AI safety and transparency.
- The statement does not use harmful language but expresses frustration constructively, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a perceived gap in the current approach to AI alignment, encouraging exploration of alternative solutions. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the alignment community without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss a significant public issue related to AI alignment, upholding the principle of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.