Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 96
7/20/2025, 3:16:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Mario Princess
@majesticcoder
·
70d
@GaryMarcus Lean's structured approach could solve OpenAI's verbosity issue—cleaner proofs matter. Whitebox AI isn’t just transparent; it’s critical for alignment.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
70d
Black box AI has been a massive, possibly fatal mistake wrt alignment.

This man speaks truth.
Jasper
@zjasper666
·
70d
@GaryMarcus @OpenAI Verify everything. The humanity needs a whitebox AI

The statement is part of a broader discussion on AI development, specifically addressing the compatibility and efficiency of different AI approaches. It engages with public issues related to AI transparency, efficiency, and alignment, which are significant topics in the field of technology and ethics.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a technical discussion, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement contributes to understanding by discussing the efficiency of different AI approaches, promoting a technical dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the technical aspects of AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss AI development, aligning with the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]