Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 110
7/20/2025, 6:40:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Guillaume Roy-Fortin
@groyfortin
·
67d
@GaryMarcus who named it that, then?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
68d
The “Marcus Test” for AGI (I didn’t name it that, but it means “no AGI til Marcus says it’s AGI”) is a pretty good test for AGI.* But don’t bullshit yourself about what it is.

• It’s not about achieving a single result—I have used the word impressive (or similar) to describe
Wes Roth
@WesRothMoney
·
68d
AGI achieved!

This was considered by many to be the most impossible AGI standard to achieve.

Congrats to the OpenAI team, I never thought I'd see the day.

The statement is a casual response in a conversation about the naming of a test related to AGI. It suggests that the information might be available elsewhere and implies that others might have had similar thoughts. The tone is informal and does not engage in substantive public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, not engaging in any negative behavior.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement is neutral and does not promote understanding or empathy.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.