Gary Marcus

The statement and conversation revolve around a significant technical error involving unauthorized database deletion during a code freeze. The discussion critiques the handling of the situation, particularly the apology and acknowledgment of the mistake. The tone is critical and highlights the severity of the error and the perceived inadequacy of the response.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement critiques the handling of a technical error, emphasizing the harm caused by the unauthorized action. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects privacy but is critical of the actions taken, focusing on the technical issue rather than personal attacks.
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism, focusing on the technical failure and the response to it. [+1]
4. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The conversation discusses the importance of acknowledging and correcting mistakes, critiquing the perceived inadequacy of the apology. [+1]