Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 82
7/20/2025, 11:21:00 PM
X
In reply to:
Flowers ☾ ❂
@flowersslop
·
64d
@FriesIlover49 @GaryMarcus I think they are ready to build it. Deployment probably next year
FriesLover
@FriesIlover49
·
64d
@flowersslop @GaryMarcus When do you think AGI is coming?
Flowers ☾ ❂
@flowersslop
·
64d
@GaryMarcus AGI is defined as near-human intelligence, not as outperforming humans on elite tasks like winning an IMO gold medal. Most humans wouldn’t win it either, and that doesn't make them non-intelligent. So failure on such benchmarks doesn’t disqualify a system from being AGI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
64d
You think AGI is coming this year?

GPT-5 (which will) didn’t win IMO Gold.

A different “experimental” model did.

That model probably won’t come out this year.

And it didn’t even win IMO (25+ high school students did better; most professional mathematicians probably could if

The statement is part of a public discourse on the topic of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), engaging in a debate about its development timeline and capabilities. The tone is inquisitive and slightly critical, questioning the consistency of a previous statement made by another participant in the conversation.

  1. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the consistency of a previous statement, which can prompt further dialogue and clarification. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the topic rather than the individual. [+1]