Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 81
7/20/2025, 11:21:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Brandon
@PixelCanuck
·
64d
@GaryMarcus It's a pretty impressive benchmark but let's be real. It's not a general model that won, it was a specially tuned model specifically designed to perform on this test

Is it still cool and impressive? Yeah, for sure. But it's still basically a marketing stunt
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
64d
You think AGI is coming this year?

GPT-5 (which will) didn’t win IMO Gold.

A different “experimental” model did.

That model probably won’t come out this year.

And it didn’t even win IMO (25+ high school students did better; most professional mathematicians probably could if

The statement 'we don’t know' is a brief response in a conversation about the capabilities and limitations of AI models, specifically in the context of AGI and benchmark tests. The tone is neutral and suggests uncertainty or acknowledgment of the complexity of the issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm as it is neutral and does not contain any harmful language.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does acknowledge the complexity of the issue, which can be seen as a step towards understanding.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a simple acknowledgment of uncertainty, which can be seen as a constructive part of the dialogue. [+1]