Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47

Score 113

@alalamin19 it’s language was actually seemingly worse. and performance was only a little better than DeepMind last year.

i would hold off on concluding too much.

7/21/2025, 12:52:42 AM

In reply to:

Alamin (He/Him)

@alalamin19

@GaryMarcus For me this achievement actually is quite significant, as I am betting quite heavily on that AI agents would keep getting better and cheaper. This continuous improvement kind of reassures that AI scaling laws are still holding up.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

Why did everyone get excited when I called (one aspect of) the new OpenAI model impressive?

I also said that each of these models were (in some respects) impressive.

r1
o1
o3
AlphaFold
AlphaGeometry2
Cicero
Genesis

and that’s just a partial list.

None of these were AGI. The

The statement engages in a discussion about the performance and language capabilities of AI models, which is a public issue related to technological advancements and their implications.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and maintains a neutral tone, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing a measured response to the previous comment, suggesting caution in drawing conclusions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]