Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the interpretability of AI systems and the warnings issued by major tech companies. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, highlighting a perceived arrogance in the industry for not addressing these concerns earlier.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by mocking the efforts of researchers, potentially undermining the seriousness of the issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing more on criticism than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, focusing instead on past warnings. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.