In reply to:
The statement is part of a conversation about the critique of technological hubris, referencing Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein' as an early critique of such attitudes. It engages with public discourse on the ethical implications of technological advancement.
- The statement does no harm and is a neutral comment on the historical context of technological critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting historical perspectives on current issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by building on the previous comments without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a meaningful discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.