Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 106
7/21/2025, 5:21:16 PM
X
In reply to:
Nishi
@AnimeBytes
路
7d
@GaryMarcus This reminds me of what I said last year as a prediction.

Open AI was going to be financially shaky by now, with a good chance of them going under by year end 'IF' they can't find new suckers... I mean investors to help keep the lights and cloud servers going.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
7d
The common line below about AGI and moving goalposts is bullshit. The actual situation is this:

馃憠 There used to be agreed upon definitions for AGI, like the ones I gave in my 2022 essay Dear Elon Musk re achieving the flexibility, generality, and resourcefulness of human
Ryu Kent
@ryukent
路
7d
@GaryMarcus The problem is there's no definition of AGI that everyone agrees with and the goal posts seem to have moved.

I say we drop the fixation with the AGI term and just enjoy the incremental improvements that come every few months. Those we can all agree are great.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the financial stability of OpenAI and comparing it to WeWork, implying skepticism about its sustainability. The conversation critiques the concept of AGI and the financial aspects of AI companies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a metaphor to critique OpenAI's financial situation, which could be seen as a humorous or critical observation rather than a harmful one.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the metaphor could be interpreted as disrespectful to OpenAI.聽[-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on OpenAI's business model.聽[-1]