The statement critiques the lack of public discussion regarding the performance of OpenAI in comparison to Google's DeepMind at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO). It suggests that OpenAI's results were underreported due to deference to the IMO and its participants, and implies that OpenAI's reputation in the math community may have been affected.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies criticism of OpenAI's handling of their results, which could be seen as indirectly harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions, and it could be seen as a subtle personal attack on OpenAI's reputation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived issue in reporting and recognition, which could be seen as an attempt to better the discourse around AI achievements. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to raise awareness about a perceived issue, but it could be more responsible by fostering constructive dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.