Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35
7/21/2025, 10:24:08 PM
X
In reply to:
Andrew Lampinen
@AndrewLampinen
·
56d
In GOFAI, representations were discrete symbols, and reasoning was formal manipulation of them. Even now, (neuro)symbolic advocates often argue that pure symbol manipulation is the only "real" intelligence, and "messy" deep learning should just be an input to symbol manipulation.
Andrew Lampinen
@AndrewLampinen
·
56d
Why do I think that's important? Because it's part of a long-term shift in how AI approaches the role of symbols in reasoning and intelligence — a shift we've been focusing on for a while, that I think brings symbols in AI closer to their role in human intelligence.
Andrew Lampinen
@AndrewLampinen
·
56d
Our LM (and others) achieved gold-medal performance in the international Math Olympiad (). Importantly, unlike last year's silver, this system used natural language end-to-end, rather than relying on a verifiable formal language.
Demis Hassabis
@demishassabis
·
57d
Official results are in - Gemini achieved gold-medal level in the International Mathematical Olympiad! 🏆 An advanced version was able to solve 5 out of 6 problems. Incredible progress - huge congrats to @lmthang and the team! https://deepmind.google/discover…
Andrew Lampinen
@AndrewLampinen
·
56d
Quick thread on the recent IMO results and the relationship between symbol manipulation, reasoning, and intelligence in machines and humans:

The statement is part of a public discourse on the role of symbolic reasoning and deep learning in artificial intelligence. It engages with a substantive debate about AI methodologies, specifically the balance between symbolic manipulation and deep learning approaches.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a respectful academic inquiry. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by asking clarifying questions about the arguments presented, fostering a deeper discussion on AI methodologies. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking questions rather than making personal attacks, contributing to a healthy debate. [+1]