Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement addresses a procedural issue related to a political convention, highlighting a tactic used by a political team to challenge quorum. It references a specific event and compares it to a past incident, suggesting a pattern of behavior. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to inform or remind the audience about the requirements for denying quorum and the historical context of such actions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as dismissive of the opposing team's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political tactic, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the procedural aspect rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to inform about procedural rules and historical context, which aligns with responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.