Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 35

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the scientific scrutiny and validity of AI claims made by companies like OpenAI and DeepMind. It engages with public discourse on the transparency and accountability of AI advancements.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm; it is a lighthearted clarification in a technical discussion.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a dialogue and does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges a potential miscommunication, which aligns with acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement contributes to a discussion on AI transparency, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly, engaging in a public debate about AI claims. [+1]