The statement compares the quality of intellectual discussion between two organizations, Google DeepMind and OpenAI, highlighting a preference for DeepMind's engagement. It suggests that DeepMind engages in serious, constructive dialogue, while OpenAI resorts to less respectful communication.
- The statement does not directly harm with words and actions, but it implies a negative view of OpenAI's communication style.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful towards OpenAI by implying their communication is unprofessional. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards OpenAI, as it contrasts them unfavorably with DeepMind. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with OpenAI, as it uses a personal attack by describing their communication as 'insulting memes.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.