The statement humorously contrasts the styles of proofs produced by DeepMind's and OpenAI's AI models, highlighting differences in formality and presentation. It uses a light-hearted tone to critique the informal style of OpenAI's proofs, suggesting they resemble a less polished, self-reassuring approach.
- The statement does not cause harm; it uses humor to make a point about AI-generated proofs. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by comparing different AI models' outputs, though it uses humor rather than empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI models without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.