Gary Marcus

The statement and linked article engage in public discourse by discussing the feasibility and financial implications of a major AI project, which is a significant public issue given the impact of AI on society and the economy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on financial and strategic analysis rather than personal attacks. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by providing a critical analysis of the financial viability of the AI project, encouraging a realistic view of its potential. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the feasibility of the $500 billion investment, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]