Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47

Score 115

@NgEJay2029 @JacobHHilton @OpenAI that’s easy. Because they are the only one who has filed years of nonprofit tax filings and the only one who promised the public and two state governments (and probably federal as well?) to work as a nonprofit in the public benefit. and the only one who leveraged that alleged

7/22/2025, 4:42:58 PM

In reply to:

SoylentGreenisAI

@NgEJay2029

51d

@JacobHHilton @OpenAI I would *very very much* like to know why only OpenAI is held to a "non-profit" principle, and every other frontier lab -- Anthropic, Google Deepmind, xAI, Meta, are ALL NEVER held to this principle. And even if so, you can't control frontier labs outside the US like Deepseek AI,

Jacob Hilton

@JacobHHilton

51d

There is still an opportunity for @OpenAI to live up to its founding promises, instead of abandoning them. Here I explain what this could look like.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the accountability and transparency of OpenAI in relation to its nonprofit status. It highlights the organization's commitments and compares them to other AI labs, questioning why OpenAI is uniquely scrutinized. The tone is critical and seeks to hold OpenAI accountable to its promises.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to hold OpenAI accountable, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting transparency and accountability. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on organizational actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's adherence to its nonprofit commitments without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]