The statement expresses skepticism about the potential for achieving alignment in large language models (LLMs) based on surprising research findings. It suggests a definitive conclusion ('Game. Set. Match.') and advocates for moving on from the current approach. The tone is critical and dismissive, indicating a strong stance on the issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses ongoing efforts without suggesting alternatives, which could be seen as unconstructive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy or understanding for those working on LLM alignment, potentially stifling constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but dismisses the efforts of others without engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.