Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a public issue involving political actions related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's financial transactions. It questions the motives of Committee Republicans in blocking an amendment, suggesting a lack of transparency and potential protection of certain interests.
- The statement implies wrongdoing by Committee Republicans, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, but it does not use harmful language directly. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the motives of a group without specific evidence.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it questions motives without offering a platform for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a public issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to question political actions, but it could be more responsible by providing evidence or context.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.