Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -106
7/22/2025, 7:55:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
Brazil's highest court could soon decide whether to imprison a women's rights activist for up to 25 years for a single sentence spoken in an Instagram video and the sharing of four X posts written by others, even though neither her words nor those of others violated any existing
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
European and Latin American leaders are at this moment working together to create a global Censorship Industrial Complex that will require every person online to deny biological reality and embrace pseudoscience.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
At first they said it was only polite to refer to someone by their preferred pronounds. Then, they demanded social media censorship. Now, governments are fining, and may soon jail, people who deny the lie that men can become women. This is as terrifying as anything in "1984."

The statement by Gabriel Quadri critiques the political situation in Mexico, labeling it as a 'totalitarian regime' and discussing issues related to freedom of expression and government control. The tone is critical and alarmist, aiming to highlight perceived authoritarian practices. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing societal and political issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by using strong language like 'totalitarian regime,' which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in a form of rhetorical attack against the Mexican government. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses charged language without offering solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses hyperbolic language rather than reasoned argument. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about perceived issues, but the approach may not contribute positively to societal betterment.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly due to its alarmist tone.