Rashida Tlaib

The statement addresses a public issue involving political actions related to the investigation of Epstein's financial transactions. It questions the motives of Committee Republicans, suggesting they are trying to hide or protect something by blocking an amendment. The tone is accusatory and implies a lack of transparency.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies wrongdoing by Committee Republicans, which could be seen as harmful if unfounded.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but questions the integrity of a group, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it questions motives without providing evidence or engaging in discussion.
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to raise awareness of a public issue, which could be seen as positive if the intent is to promote transparency.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by providing evidence or engaging in dialogue rather than making accusations.