Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47

Score -101

Reposted by Michael Shellenberger

I’ve been working on this story for years. Last February I teamed with @shellenberger and @galexybrane on a report about the 2017 ICA as WMD-style “cooked” intel. Today’s news confirms all that reporting. Others like @aaronjmate @ProfMJCleveland and @MZHemingway also vindicated

John Schaefer

@johnhschaefer

@mtaibbi @DNIGabbard It seems that you are being spoon fed the conclusions from the administration and running with them as if you came up with them on your own.

7/24/2025, 1:41:06 AM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the validity of intelligence related to the 2017 ICA and its implications on public narratives about Russiagate. It claims vindication for previous reporting and references a new report that challenges established views.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to correct perceived misinformation, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting accurate information. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By referencing multiple journalists and reports, the statement attempts to foster understanding and transparency, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on the content of the report and its implications, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]