Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -107
7/24/2025, 11:18:09 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
@realDonaldTrump @Gina_McDee @JacquiBerlinn @Twolfrecovery @EricaJSandberg @bettersoma @war24182236 To debunk the disinformation by @GavinNewsom and the media about addiction enablement ("harm reducation"), see this comparison of five European cities with "open drug scenes." There is only one solution to open-air drug markets and it's shutting them down!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
@realDonaldTrump Congratulations to everyone who has worked hard to expose the drug death and addiction crisis and demand rational action. Be sure to follow @Gina_McDee @JacquiBerlinn @Twolfrecovery @EricaJSandberg @bettersoma @war24182236 to demand action at all levels of government.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
From the US to Europe to Asia, there is one and only one humane way to deal with "homelessness" and it's this, below. It's wonderful to see it in this new Executive Order by @realDonaldTrump :

"The Order redirects funding to ensure that individuals camping on streets and causing
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1d
It's better to let mentally ill people buy and use meth and fentanyl on sidewalks, believes Gavin Newsom, than arrest their drug dealers, and them, and mandate rehab.

But enabling Mexican-Chinese drug mafias to murder mentally ill Americans with fentanyl, as they do everyday

The statement is a critique of progressive policies, suggesting they harm mentally ill individuals. It promotes a book that aligns with this viewpoint, implying that reading it will provide insight into the issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, suggesting that certain policies 'kill' people, which may not promote constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It could be seen as disrespectful to those who support progressive policies, potentially violating their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]