Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 74
7/25/2025, 3:01:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Alarga ⏹️
@AlexAlarga
·
38d
@GaryMarcus @geoffreyhinton A virus is not technically "alive", either.
Can still decimate humanity.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
38d
A neural network is not a “being”, @geoffreyhinton, any more than a Tetris app on your phone is. (Reinstall Tetris and it comes back to life!)
vitrupo
@vitrupo
·
40d
Geoffrey Hinton says LLMs are immortal.

Destroy the hardware, save the weights. Rebuild them later, and “the very same being comes back to life.”

But humans don't work that way. We're bound to our substrate.

Not even Kurzweil gets a backup.

The statement engages in a discussion about the nature of neural networks and their comparison to living beings, addressing the philosophical and practical implications of AI. It emphasizes the importance of clear distinctions in ontology and metaphysics when discussing AI risks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to clarify a conceptual distinction, which can help in understanding and mitigating risks associated with AI, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By encouraging clarity in discourse, the statement promotes understanding and thoughtful consideration of complex topics. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a potential confusion in the conversation, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]