Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and accompanying content engage in public discourse by discussing the decline in Baltimore's murder rate and the strategies employed to achieve this. The tone is critical of 'woke' policies, suggesting that stricter law enforcement is more effective. The statement contrasts different approaches to crime reduction, highlighting a debate on public safety strategies.
- The statement critiques 'woke' policies, which may not promote understanding or empathy towards those advocating for such approaches. It could be seen as dismissive, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards alternative crime reduction strategies, focusing instead on a singular approach. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a critique of opposing views but does not engage in constructive dialogue or acknowledge the potential benefits of alternative strategies. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.