Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques AI models, specifically GPT-5, by describing them as 'pastiche' and suggesting they lack genuine understanding, instead creating complex collages of prior art. This engages in public discourse as it addresses the capabilities and limitations of AI, a significant societal issue.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive of AI advancements, which might indirectly affect those working in the field.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards AI developers or the technology itself, focusing instead on its limitations. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the technology rather than individuals, avoiding personal attacks, but it does not engage in constructive dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique AI technology, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.