Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 52
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
23d
@stevender_ @WSJ you should read the actual substack essay. i literally said exactly same about gpt-4, and have many reservations as noted.
7/29/2025, 6:09:59 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Harvey
@alexharv074
·
23d
@GaryMarcus @WSJ Why the confidence that GPT-5 will blow our minds though? Nothing since GPT-4 has blown my mind so far.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
24d
Predictions for GPT-5, as mentioned today in an @wsj newsletter

0. GPT-5 will surely be better, a lot better than GPT-4. I guarantee that minds will be blown. When it comes out, it will totally eclipse GPT-4.

but

1. GPT-5 will still, like its predecessors, be a bull in a

The statement is part of a public discourse on the development and impact of AI models, specifically GPT-5, and involves a discussion on expectations and predictions about its capabilities. The tone is inquisitive and skeptical, questioning the confidence in GPT-5's potential impact.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral inquiry about the expectations of GPT-5.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage a dialogue about technological advancements.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the confidence in GPT-5 without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]