The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of educational opportunities and school choice, critiquing a public figure's actions and policies related to public and private schooling during a pandemic.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of a public figure's actions, which is a normal part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public figure's policy decisions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims, and it borders on a personal attack by implying hypocrisy. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to critique a public figure's policy decisions, which is a responsible use of the platform, but it could be more constructive.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.