Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement discusses a significant political event, expressing a critical stance on the decision of some Senators to continue supporting military aid to Israel. It uses strong language ('shame') to express disapproval, indicating a clear bias and emotional tone.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or divisive, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment but uses language that could be seen as disrespectful to those with opposing views. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on shaming rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses personal attacks ('shame') rather than reasoned argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.