Michael Schellenberger

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 18
7/31/2025, 3:53:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
42d
What’s more, FBI General Counsel James Baker, “unlike his colleagues, did not dismiss the credibility” of the Russian reports that Obama had pressured Attorney General Loretta Lynch to pressure the FBI to drop the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, particularly given
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
42d
In contrast to the CIA, the FBI rejected the intelligence and invented flimsy reasons not to trust it. The FBI's dismissive attitude also contrasts sharply with the FBI's credulousness toward any evidence that implictated the Trump campaign.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
42d
The newly declassified appendix to the Durham report is game-changing. It showed that the CIA believed Russian intelligence memos, which analyzed hacked emails and alleged a Clinton Plan to vilify Trump by linking him to Russia, were credible.

"The CIA prepared a written
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
42d
The newly declassified documents on the Trump-Russia collusion hoax are a "nothingburger," say the media. But now, newly declassified intelligence strongly suggests that the FBI helped the Clinton campaign orchestrate the hoax to distract from its investigation into her email.

The statement and accompanying images discuss a controversial meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch, suggesting potential bias and interference in the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails. The tone is investigative and critical, aiming to highlight perceived misconduct and political influence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential misconduct, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by bringing attention to possible ethical issues. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by focusing on public figures and their actions in an official capacity, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of public officials, though it could be seen as speculative without concrete evidence. [-1]