Michael Schellenberger

Rank 25 of 47

Score 18

-5

Despite credible evidence of a Clinton Plan to fabricate a scandal accusing Trump of working with Russia to interfere in the election, the FBI appears to have done exactly what Clinton wanted. It opened its Crossfire Hurricane investigation into alleged coordination between

7/31/2025, 4:07:11 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

In fact, the FBI was happy to use the Dutch agency’s Cozy Bear intelligence to allege Russian election interference, even while it rejected intelligence from the same Dutch source when it came to the information about Hillary Clinton.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

Everyone involved acknowledged the credibility of the source of the Russian intelligence reports and hacked emails, referred to as “T1,” which appears to have been the Netherlands’ General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD), which hacked into the Russian hacking group “Cozy

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

Another red flag for Baker was that Lynch had asked Comey to downplay the Clinton email investigation by referring to it as a "matter" rather than an investigation.

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

One of those suspicious behaviors was Lynch's meeting with Bill Clinton on a airport tarmac in Phoenix.

"As his wife is under federal investigation for her use of a private email server, former President Bill Clinton met privately with U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

What’s more, FBI General Counsel James Baker, “unlike his colleagues, did not dismiss the credibility” of the Russian reports that Obama had pressured Attorney General Loretta Lynch to pressure the FBI to drop the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, particularly given

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

42d

In contrast to the CIA, the FBI rejected the intelligence and invented flimsy reasons not to trust it. The FBI's dismissive attitude also contrasts sharply with the FBI's credulousness toward any evidence that implictated the Trump campaign.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged political manipulation and bias within the FBI regarding investigations into election interference. It suggests a conspiracy involving the Clinton campaign and critiques the FBI's actions.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, which may influence public perception negatively. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It may not fully respect the privacy and dignity of those involved by making accusations without definitive proof. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging other perspectives. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead focuses on accusations, which may not foster productive dialogue. [-1]