Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement discusses a public issue involving freedom of speech and censorship, suggesting that a journalist's request to interview a public figure could reveal either persecution or provide a platform for an innocent voice. It engages with themes of media freedom and governmental transparency, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies potential harm by suggesting persecution and censorship.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in direct harassment or hate speech, though it implies criticism of a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but presents a scenario that could lead to constructive dialogue about censorship and freedom of speech. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for an interview that could reveal important truths, using the platform responsibly to highlight issues of censorship. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.