The statement reports on a public figure's intention to take action against a government official following a jobs report, which is a matter of public concern and policy. It involves public discourse as it addresses the governance and accountability of public officials.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the action it reports could be seen as retaliatory, potentially harming the professional integrity of the labor statistics chief. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the reported action could be perceived as undermining the dignity of the labor statistics chief. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it reports on a potentially punitive action without context or dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it reports a unilateral decision without discussion or justification. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is a report of an intended action.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the influence of a public figure to potentially impact public perception and policy, but not necessarily for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public figure's statement, but the responsibility and integrity of the action reported are questionable.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.