Michael Schellenberger

The statement discusses the actions of Brazilian judicial and electoral officials in the context of the January 8 events, suggesting authoritarian practices and potential misuse of power. It implies a lack of due process and transparency, raising concerns about justice and governance.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement suggests harm through authoritarian practices and potential misuse of power, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It raises privacy concerns by implying the use of social media for judicial purposes, potentially violating privacy and dignity. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The tone is critical and accusatory, which may not promote understanding or empathy. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of judicial actions, but it lacks constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on officials. [-1]