Michael Schellenberger

The statement questions the actions of a task force and the broader implications for freedom of speech and democratic processes. It suggests skepticism about the ability to question authority and the legitimacy of actions taken against individuals for their social media posts.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies potential harm by suggesting that questioning authority is being suppressed, which could undermine trust in democratic processes. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It raises concerns about privacy and dignity, as it discusses individuals being flagged for their social media activity. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the task force's actions, but it does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By questioning the actions of the task force, the statement could be seen as using influence to highlight potential issues in governance. [+1]