In reply to:
Andr茅 Shalders
@andreshalders
路
19d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
19d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing allegations of illegal actions by the Brazilian Supreme Court, which is a significant public issue. The tone is serious and critical, focusing on the legality and implications of judicial decisions based on social media posts.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by judicial actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks.聽[+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a legal issue, though it could further encourage empathy by considering multiple perspectives.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the legality of the actions without resorting to personal attacks.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.