In reply to:
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
路
192d
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
路
192d
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
路
192d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
路
192d
The statement and its context involve a discussion about alleged abuses of power by Brazil's Supreme Court and the impact of US sanctions. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on the actions of a specific justice and the media. The conversation touches on issues of governance, media influence, and international relations.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm.聽[-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement criticizes a public figure, which is generally acceptable in public discourse, but the language used could be seen as disrespectful.聽[-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks a balanced perspective.聽[-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack, rather than constructive dialogue.聽[-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.