Michael Schellenberger

Rank 17 of 47

Score 63

Reposted by Michael Shellenberger

Os novos documentos mostrando como atuava a força-tarefa de Moraes, evidenciam ainda mais absurdos. A chefe de gabinete do ministro diz que a PGR pediu liberdade provisória para as pessoas, mas que ele não queria soltar sem antes “ver nas redes se tem alguma coisa”.

8/4/2025, 5:40:59 PM

The statement criticizes the actions of a task force led by a minister, suggesting improper conduct in legal proceedings. It implies that decisions on provisional freedom were influenced by social media activity, which raises concerns about due process and judicial integrity.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to highlight potential misconduct, which could be seen as striving to prevent harm by exposing issues. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects privacy by not naming individuals directly involved, but the implication of misconduct could affect reputations. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of a public figure's actions, which could be constructive if it leads to accountability, but lacks detailed evidence.