In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
14d
The statement criticizes the actions of Brazil's Supreme Court and its minister, Alexandre de Moraes, suggesting that their actions against former President Bolsonaro are damaging to democracy. It implies a misuse of power under the guise of protecting democracy, which is a serious accusation involving public figures and institutions.
- The statement could potentially harm public trust in democratic institutions by suggesting they are acting undemocratically. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the actions of a public official, which could be seen as a lack of respect for their role, though it does not engage in personal attacks. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the complexity of the situation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.