Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement and linked article discuss a public issue involving the actions of a magistrate, Alexandre de Moraes, and their implications on fundamental rights, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is analytical and critical, focusing on the legal interpretation of a magistrate's role.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, as it is a professional critique of a public figure's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by presenting an expert's opinion on the magistrate's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing a legal issue and providing expert analysis. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.